4th Grade · 4.NF.A.2
Comparing fractions in 4th grade
Comparing fractions means deciding which of two fractions is greater, such as and , and writing the answer with >, < or =. In 4th grade, the two fractions can have different top numbers and different bottom numbers. Your child learns several ways to decide and explains each answer with a drawing or a reason.
What the standard says
The official Common Core wording, quoted exactly. The plain version follows.
4.NF.A.2 Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as . Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.
What it means, in plain words
A fraction has two parts. The bottom number, the denominator, tells how many equal pieces the whole is cut into. The top number, the numerator, tells how many of those pieces you have. In 3rd grade, your child compared fractions that share one of these numbers, such as and .
Comparing fractions in 4th grade means comparing fractions with different denominators, where neither number matches. One way is to compare each fraction with a landmark such as or 1. Another is to rewrite both fractions with the same denominator, called a common denominator, or with the same numerator. Any common denominator works, so your child does not have to find the smallest one. A third way looks at how far each fraction is from 1 whole: is away from 1 and is only away, so is greater.
Two fractions can only be compared when they are parts of the same whole. Half of a big sandwich is more food than half of a small one, even though both are . Your child records the result with > (is greater than), < (is less than) or = (is equal to) and shows why with a drawing, such as two bars of the same length.
Your child should be able to:
- Compare a fraction with or 1 to decide which of two fractions is greater
- Rewrite two fractions with a common denominator and compare the numerators
- Record a comparison with >, < or =
- Explain the answer with a drawing of two equal wholes
Example
Which is greater, or ?
- Half of 5 pieces is pieces. 2 pieces is less than that, so is less than .
- Half of 10 pieces is 5 pieces. 7 pieces is more than that, so is more than .
- One fraction is below one half and the other is above it, so . is greater.
Example
Which is greater, or ?
- Both fractions are less than , so the landmark does not decide it.
- Cut each third into 4 equal pieces. Then .
- Now both fractions count twelfths. 5 twelfths is more than 4 twelfths, so . is greater.
Where children usually get stuck
Your child says and are equal, because each one is 2 pieces short of a whole.
This is real reasoning: the child compares how much is missing instead of looking at one number at a time. The missing pieces are different sizes, though. Sixths are smaller than fifths, so a gap of 2 sixths is smaller than a gap of 2 fifths.
What helps. Draw two bars of the same length, cut one into fifths and the other into sixths, and shade both fractions. The empty part of the sixths bar is shorter, so is greater.
Your child says is greater than , because 8 is greater than 3.
With whole numbers, a bigger number always means more. In a fraction, a bigger denominator means the whole is cut into more pieces, so each piece is smaller.
What helps. Cut two strips of paper of the same length. Fold one into 3 equal parts and the other into 8, then hold one part of each side by side.
To get a common denominator, your child changes only the bottom number and writes as .
The child treats the denominator as a label to swap. Cutting every fifth into 2 pieces also doubles the number of shaded pieces, so the top number has to change too.
What helps. Draw as a bar, then split each fifth in half with a pencil line. Count the shaded pieces together. There are 6, so .
Try four practice questions
Real 4th grade questions from our question bank, easiest first. Answer them right here, check each one, and see a worked solution for any question.
The problems didn’t load. Check your connection and tap again.
- 1Warm-upFind the missing denominators to make both fractions have a numerator of 2. Then select the symbol that compares the two fractions.
Original fraction New numerator New denominator 2 2 Now compare the fractions: Show the answer and how to solve it
The missing denominators are and , and .
- 1Look at the two fractions, and , and the target common numerator of .
- 2To rewrite with a numerator of , multiply both the numerator and denominator by (because ):
- 3The fraction already has a numerator of , so its denominator stays . Now compare and : they share the same numerator. Since , the pieces in are smaller, so , which means .
Common mistake. A common mistake is to think that the fraction with the larger denominator is the larger fraction. When two fractions have the same numerator, the OPPOSITE is true: the one with the smaller denominator is larger, because the same number of pieces is taken from larger pieces.
The idea underneath. When two fractions share a numerator, the one with the smaller denominator is larger — the pieces are bigger, so the same number of pieces gives a larger amount.
- 2On levelMaya compared two fractions using 0 and 1 as benchmarks. Maya's work is shown below.
Fraction Where it falls less than 1 equal to 1 Select the statement that best describes Maya's work.AMaya should have marked as greater than .BMaya compared only the numerators of and .CThe comparison is correct.DMaya identified each benchmark correctly but reversed the comparison symbol.Show the answer and how to solve it
Maya's benchmark notes are both correct and the comparison is correct, so the comparison is correct.
- 1Look at Maya's work. Maya wrote two benchmark notes and one comparison statement.
- 2Check the first benchmark note. The fraction has a numerator smaller than its denominator (), so it is less than . Maya's note 'less than ' is correct.
- 3Check the second benchmark note. The fraction has a numerator equal to its denominator, so it equals . Maya's note 'equal to ' is correct.
- 4Use the benchmarks to compare. Since is less than and equals , the left fraction is smaller, so the correct symbol is . Maya wrote , which matches.
- 5Both benchmark notes are correct and the comparison symbol is correct, so Maya's work has no error.
Common mistake. A common mistake is assuming a comparison must contain an error. When every benchmark note and the symbol are correct, the right choice is that the comparison is correct.
The idea underneath. To judge a benchmark comparison you must check two things: each fraction's benchmark note and the comparison symbol. Here both are right.
- 3On levelThese fractions name parts of the same whole. Select the symbol that completes the comparison.ABC
Show the answer and how to solve it
is less than . After rewriting both with numerator , you get and . Because , the fraction has bigger pieces, so .
- 1Look at the numerators of and . The numerators are and . The smallest number that both and divide into is , so rewrite both fractions with numerator .
- 2Rewrite with numerator by multiplying the top and bottom by :
- 3Rewrite with numerator by multiplying the top and bottom by :
- 4Now compare and . With the same numerator, the fraction with the smaller denominator is larger because the whole is split into fewer, bigger pieces. Since :
- 5So . The correct symbol is .
Common mistake. A common mistake is thinking the fraction with the larger denominator is greater after rewriting. With the SAME numerator, the SMALLER denominator gives the LARGER fraction, because the whole is split into fewer (and therefore bigger) pieces.
The idea underneath. When two fractions have the same numerator, the one with the SMALLER denominator is LARGER, because the whole is divided into fewer, bigger pieces. Making common numerators is often easier than making common denominators when the numerators have a small common multiple.
- 4StretchLiam wants to compare and by giving them a common denominator.
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Select the statement that best describes the steps shown.AAfter converting the fractions, Liam put the wrong symbol between them.BLiam's work is correct.CLiam changed a denominator without multiplying the matching numerator.DLiam multiplied the numerator by the wrong number when converting one fraction to the common denominator.Show the answer and how to solve it
Both of Liam's conversions are correct, but he used the wrong symbol. Since , the correct conclusion is .
- 1Look at Liam's two conversions in Steps and . He is changing and to a common denominator of .
- 2Check each conversion. To go from denominator to , multiply by ; to go from denominator to , multiply by .
- 3Both conversions are correct. Now compare the new numerators: , so . Liam wrote in Step instead of .
- 4The conversions are fine. The only error is the comparison symbol: Liam used when the correct symbol is . This also makes Step wrong.
Common mistake. A common mistake is to check only the conversions and then accept the symbol without verifying it. Always compare the converted numerators directly: means the symbol must be , not .
The idea underneath. After converting to common denominators, the symbol comparing the original fractions must follow the comparison of the new numerators. Here means the symbol must be , not .