5th Grade · 5.NBT.B.6
Long division with 2-digit divisors in 5th grade
Long division with 2-digit divisors means dividing by a number from 10 to 99, such as . In 5th grade, your child divides numbers of up to four digits by two-digit numbers. The standards ask for methods built on place value, such as partial quotients and area models. The fast written method many parents learned is a 6th grade goal.
What the standard says
The official Common Core wording, quoted exactly. The plain version follows.
5.NBT.B.6 Find whole-number quotients of whole numbers with up to four-digit dividends and two-digit divisors, using strategies based on place value, the properties of operations, and/or the relationship between multiplication and division. Illustrate and explain the calculation by using equations, rectangular arrays, and/or area models.
What it means, in plain words
Division has its own words. The dividend is the number being divided, the divisor is the number you divide by and the quotient is the answer. The remainder is what is left over when the divisor does not fit exactly. In , 864 is the dividend, 24 is the divisor and 36 is the quotient.
Division with two-digit divisors is harder than dividing by one digit. The times tables no longer give the answer directly, so your child has to estimate. With partial quotients, your child takes away easy chunks, such as 10, 20 or 5 times the divisor. This goes on until what is left is smaller than the divisor. Adding up the chunks gives the quotient.
Long division with 2-digit divisors ends with a check by multiplication, because multiplying undoes dividing. The divisor times the quotient, plus the remainder, must give back the dividend. An area model shows the same idea as a rectangle. The dividend is the area, the divisor is one side and the quotient is the other side.
Your child should be able to:
- Divide a number of up to four digits by a two-digit number
- Use partial quotients or an area model and explain each step
- Estimate the quotient first by rounding, such as treating 31 as 30
- Check an answer: the divisor times the quotient, plus the remainder, gives the dividend
Example
What is ?
- Take an easy chunk first: .
- Subtract: . That is still more than 24, so keep going.
- . Subtract: .
- Add the chunks: . Check: .
- So 864 divided by 24 is 36.
Example
A school packs 1,550 crayons into boxes of 32. How many boxes can it fill, and how many crayons are left over?
- The problem is .
- Take a big chunk: . Subtract: .
- Take another chunk: . Subtract: .
- 14 is less than 32, so stop. The quotient is with a remainder of 14.
- Check: .
- The school fills 48 boxes and has 14 crayons left over.
Where children usually get stuck
Your child answers with 17 R 29.
The child stopped taking away chunks too early. A remainder of 29 means one more 24 still fits, so the answer is 18 R 5.
What helps. After every division, ask whether the remainder is smaller than the divisor. If it is not, one more group fits.
Your child erases guess after guess, trying , then , then .
With a two-digit divisor, the times tables no longer give the next digit. Guessing without a plan wears the child out.
What helps. Before starting, write a short list of easy multiples of the divisor: , , . Your child then picks chunks from the list.
Your child divides 2,460 by 12 and writes 25 instead of 205.
In the written method, 12 does not fit into 6 tens, so the tens digit of the quotient is 0. The child skips that step and the 0 goes missing.
What helps. Estimate first: , so the answer must be a bit more than 200. An answer of 25 is clearly too small.
Try four practice questions
Real 5th grade questions from our question bank, easiest first. Answer them right here, check each one, and see a worked solution for any question.
The problems didn’t load. Check your connection and tap again.
- 1Warm-upJake wants to decide whether 39 R 18 makes sense as an answer for . His check is shown below. An answer makes sense here when the quotient is close to the correct estimate and the remainder is less than the divisor.
Round Estimate Conclusion Select the statement that best describes Jake's work.AThe student made a rounding mistake because 840 should have been rounded to 1,000 instead of 800.BThe student's work is correct.CThe student rounded correctly, but is 40, so 39 R 18 is not reasonable.DThe student's conclusion is wrong because 39 R 18 is not the exact answer to .Show the answer and how to solve it
The student's work is correct. The rounding, estimate, and conclusion all hold up.
- 1Jake's rounding is sensible. Changing to uses nearby compatible numbers.
- 2Verify the estimate from the rounded numbers.
- 3Compare the proposed answer to the estimate. The quotient 39 is only 1 away from 40, and the remainder 18 is less than the divisor 21.
- 4The rounding, estimate, and conclusion are all correct, so Jake's work is correct.
Common mistake. A common mistake is assuming the work must contain an error. Here the rounding to , the estimate 40, and the reasonable conclusion all hold up.
The idea underneath. An answer makes sense when the quotient is close to the correct estimate and the remainder is smaller than the divisor. If a remainder is not smaller, you can make another full group.
- 2On levelAlex is solving using partial quotients. His work is shown below.
638 − 540 18 × 30 98 − 90 18 × 5 12 remainder35 quotientSelect the statement that best describes Alex's work.AThe student's work is correct.BThe final quotient total is incorrect.CThe first partial-quotient step is incorrect.DThe second partial-quotient step is incorrect.Show the answer and how to solve it
The correct choice is "The second partial-quotient step is incorrect." The first row and the total 35 are correct, but should be 8, not 12.
- 1Check each row from top to bottom before deciding.
- 2The first step is correct.
- 3The second product is correct, but the second subtraction should give 8, not 12.
- 4The partial quotients 30 and 5 count groups of 18. Adding the group counts gives 35 groups. Adding the partial quotients gives the correct total.
Common mistake. A common mistake is checking only the products and . In partial quotients, each new remainder must also come from subtraction, so has to be checked too.
The idea underneath. Each partial quotient counts groups of the divisor. Add these group counts for the quotient, and check each multiplication and subtraction.
- 3On levelA student is dividing with partial quotients. In the work below, explain the second subtraction step.
252 − 150 15 × 10 102 − 90 15 × 6 12 remainder16 quotientUse the dropdowns to complete the explanation below.The number being subtracted in the second step is:This is true because the matching equation is:Show the answer and how to solve it
The number being subtracted in the second step is a multiple of the divisor because .
- 1Find the second subtraction row in the workspace. After the first step, 102 is left; the second row subtracts 90 and leaves 12.
- 2Use the divisor and the partial quotient from the second row.
- 3Since 90 is made by multiplying the divisor 15 by 6, the number 90 is a multiple of the divisor.
Common mistake. A common mistake is calling 90 the remainder because it appears in the subtraction area. The remainders around the second step are 102 before and 12 after, while 90 is the amount subtracted.
The idea underneath. Each subtraction in partial quotients removes a chunk equal to the divisor multiplied by that row's partial quotient.
- 4StretchThe completed work below shows with partial quotients.
672 − 460 23 × 20 212 − 161 23 × 7 51 − 46 23 × 2 5 remainder29 quotientFill in the blanks to match the work, in step order. Each step appears as a multiplication or its product. Add the remainder only when it is not zero.Show the answer and how to solve it
The blanks are , , and , so the equation is .
- 1Read the completed work. The divisor is , the partial quotients are , , and , and the remainder is .
- 2Multiply each partial quotient by the divisor to find the amount subtracted.
- 3The equation writes the first chunk as blank, the second chunk's product is already shown, the third chunk's product goes in the second blank, and the remainder goes in the third blank.
- 4So the blanks, in order, are , , and .
Common mistake. A common mistake is writing the total quotient in the first blank instead of the partial quotient . Another mistake is writing (the third partial quotient) in the second blank instead of the product .
The idea underneath. Partial-quotients work already breaks the dividend into divisor multiples and a remainder, so the equation is just a one-line record of those same chunks.